Prevention Mindset Institute
What is the Prevention Mindset Institute?
The FRIENDS National Center for Community-Based Child-Abuse Prevention (FRIENDS) initiated the Prevention Mindset Institute (PMI) to identify strategies showing promise for shifting mindsets toward prevention. FRIENDS’ goal is to share knowledge with selected state teams, learn from participants, and disseminate our findings with others in child welfare and prevention. Our vision is that systems shift from intervening with families after bad things have happened, to putting significant energy and resources into prevention and early intervention.
What is Primary Prevention?
Primary prevention looks like communities focused on family strengthening, which may include family resource/success centers, schools teaching social-emotional health, concrete supports provided when families are struggling with housing, utilities, food, or other necessities, among many other strategies. The shift to prevention offers families the opportunity to overcome challenges, is not viewing poverty as neglect, advances kinship care, makes most child removals unnecessary, and promotes the best possible outcomes for our nation’s children.
The PMI is a group of national partners, parents, and state teams committed to child welfare systems transformation. The selected states have set ambitious goals to create more prevention-focused and equitable environments that support child and family well-being. They are partnering with communities, identifying critical stakeholders, addressing policy and structural changes, and tracking progress towards successful outcomes.
Please see the tabs below for an overview and the 2020 – 2021 PMI Summary Report for greater detail on PMI activities and expected outcomes identified by the first cohort of states. A second cohort was selected in March 2022 and will be participating in the PMI through early 2024.
CBCAP
Prevention Mindset Institute Episode 1: Shifting Minds; Changing Systems
Since 2020, FRIENDS National Center for CBCAP has convened the Prevention Mindset Institute (PMI). The PMI consists of 2 cohorts of a total of 11 states. State teams are typically the CBCAP lead, a member representing the child protection system, a parent leader and a community partner. The state teams join with national partners from the Alliance of Children’s Trust Funds, Action4Child Protection, Mining for Gold LLC, the Prevention Institute, and prevention advocate Alex Morales to work together to strategize to shift work done on behalf of children and families to be more focused on prevention. In this episode, FRIENDS National Parent Advisory Council (PAC) members Valerie Lebanion and Michael Cupeles talk with CBCAP State Leads, Sasha Rasco from Texas and Nicole Sillaman from Ohio about their participation in the Prevention Mindset Institute.
Hosts
Michael Cupeles, FRIENDS National Parent Advisory Council Member
Valerie Lebanion, FRIENDS National Parent Advisory Council Member
Participants
Sasha Rasco, Chief Community Wellbeing Officer, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
Nicole Sillaman, Executive Director, Ohio Children’s Trust Fund
Joanne Hodgeman, FRIENDS National Parent Advisory Council Member
Prevention Mindset Institute Episode 2: Shifting Minds; Changing Systems continued – Parents join the conversation
Since 2020, FRIENDS National Center for CBCAP has convened the Prevention Mindset Institute (PMI). The PMI consists of 2 cohorts of a total of 11 states. State teams are typically the CBCAP lead, a member representing the child protection system, a parent leader and a community partner. The state teams join with national partners from the Alliance of Children’s Trust Funds, Action4Child Protection, Mining for Gold LLC, the Prevention Institute, and prevention advocate Alex Morales to work together to strategize to shift work done on behalf of children and families to be more focused on prevention. In this podcast episode, FRIENDS National Parent Advisory Council (PAC) members Valerie Lebanion and Michael Cupeles talk with PAC member, Joanne Hodgeman, joining Valerie and Michael to reflect on Ohio and Texas’ work.
Hosts
Michael Cupeles, FRIENDS National Parent Advisory Council Member
Valerie Lebanion, FRIENDS National Parent Advisory Council Member
Participants
Sasha Rasco, Chief Community Wellbeing Officer, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
Nicole Sillaman, Executive Director, Ohio Children’s Trust Fund
Joanne Hodgeman, FRIENDS National Parent Advisory Council Member
Prevention Mindset Institute Episode 3: Shifting Mindsets by Revising Laws – One state’s journey to assure poverty is not misconstrued as neglect
In this episode, FRIENDS National Parent Advisory Council (PAC) members Paula Bibb-Samuels and Michael Cupeles talk with Margaret Perkins, from the Kentucky Division of Prevention and Community Well-Being of the Department for Community-Based Services and Valerie Lebanion, a parent leader in Kentucky’s Community Collaborations for Children initiative and a FRIENDS PAC member.
Margaret, Valerie, and our hosts discuss Kentucky’s prevention mindset shift including unraveling the story of Kentucky’s bold move – a revision of their neglect statute. Why? To ensure that poverty is not misconstrued as child neglect.
The episode concludes with FRIENDS PAC members Joanne Hodgeman, Matthew Porter, and David Armstrong joining the conversation.
Hosts
Paula Bibbs-Samuels, FRIENDS National Parent Advisory Council Member
Michael Cupeles, FRIENDS National Parent Advisory Council Member
Participants
Margaret Perkins, Primary Prevention Branch Manager, Division of Prevention and Community Well-Being, Kentucky Department for Community Based Services
Valerie Lebanion, State Parent Leader for the Kentucky Community Collaborations for Children
Prevention Mindset Institute Episode 4: Open, Courageous, Transparent – two child welfare directors reflect on doing right by families
Tune in to our latest podcast episode where we delve into the transformative journey of child welfare systems with leaders from Michigan and the District of Columbia. Hosted by FRIENDS PAC members, Paula Bibb-Samuels from Texas and David Armstrong from New Jersey, alongside esteemed guests Demetrius Starling and Robert L Matthews, this episode is a deep dive into the shift towards a prevention mindset in child protection.
Listen as Demetrius Starling,the Senior Deputy Director of Children Services Administration in Michigan, shares insights into leading prevention efforts, including initiatives likeCBCAP, while Robert L Matthews, Director of the Child Family Services Agency in Washington, DC, offers perspectives on family strengthening and prevention strategies in his jurisdiction.
Through compelling narratives and real-world experiences, our guests reveal the challenges and triumphs of transforming entrenched systems, resistant to change. Discover how they bravely engage with those impacted by these systems, forging collaborative pathways towards co-created solutions. Join us as we explore the power of bold leadership and community engagement in reshaping the future of child welfare. The episode concludes with reflections from PAC member Michael Cupeles.
Prevention Mindset Institute Episode 5: Parents as Architects: A Collaborative Approach to Building a Culture of Shared Responsibility
In this episode, three members of the Maine team who participated in the Prevention Mindset Institute take us behind the scenes of the bold new vision to create a culture of shared responsibility for the safety and well-being for children and families in Maine.
Listeners will hear how this mindset shift is gaining momentum— from the Governor’s office to local Prevention Councils to individual parents and practitioners —creating a wave of change across the state. At the heart of this effort is building trusting partnerships with parents through authentic engagement and shared language. Tune in to discover how collaboration, relationships, and truly listening are driving this transformative work.
FRIENDS PAC members Valerie Lebanion and Michael Cupeles wrap up the episode by sharing their key takeaways from this inspiring and insightful discussion. If you’re passionate about strengthening families and creating lasting change, this is an episode you won’t want to miss!
Hosts:
Paula Bibbs-Samuels, FRIENDS National Parent Advisory Council Member
David Armstrong, FRIENDS National Parent Advisory Council Member
Participants:
Heidi Aakjer, Executive Director of the Maine Children’s Trust
Christine Theriault, Family First Prevention Services Program Manager, Maine Office of Child and Family Services
Joe Whitmore, Parent Leader, Penquis Prevention Council, and FRIENDS National Parent Advisory Council Member
Values and Principles – Prevention Mindset Institute
FRIENDS has convened national experts in prevention, including Action4Child Protection, the Children’s Trust Fund Alliance, Mining for Gold, the Prevention Institute, and FRIENDS’ Parent Advisory Council to join with six teams from states who are leaders in work to develop ambitious and promising strategies for a new kind of child welfare system. The state teams are comprised of CBCAP state agency leads, state child welfare leadership, and other state partners. Together this group forms the Prevention Mindset Institute (PMI). The group will convene virtually and in-person over the next year to support and influence efforts towards building a child wellbeing system that focuses on engaging with families in order to identify and provide supports that strengthen them and their communities.
PMI participants recognize that a clear set of values and principles illustrate what is important to a group of people and their mission. Values convey the beliefs participants share as they embark on this work. Principles are those crucial concepts and actions essential for moving the work forward guided by our values. Together, they provide critical information for bringing others into the collaboration, navigating conflicts, and remaining focused on outcomes.
Prevention Mindset Institute participants articulate these values and principles for building a new system:
VALUES
- Families are the experts of their own experience. Children are best cared for in their own families with resources and supports accessible, as needed, to remain safely intact.
- Respect that learning and knowledge comes from a variety of methods and sources, both empirical and experiential, and there is equal value in both.
- Listening more than talking is a key component of effective and meaningful change.
- Trust both in the good intentions of those who have declared a commitment to the work; and acknowledgment that there is work to do to rebuild trust in many communities.
- Optimism: Change is possible.
- Humility: Seek and be open to learning that may result in our own mindset shifts.
- Steadfastness: We are committed to long-term sustainable mindset shifts and systems change, even when situations demanding immediate response may momentarily slow the broader commitment to change.
- Patience: Change does not come quickly.
- Persistence: We are trying to shift entrenched beliefs and recognize that the old way of doing things may not be optimal.
- Creativity: We are willing to consider actions we may not have tried before and are open to experiencing the learning opportunities provided when we don’t get the results we intended.
- Collaboration: Pooling our knowledge, leveraging our differences, and co-creating the definition of success will bring about better results than any of us could achieve alone.
PRINCIPLES
- Primary Prevention: Utilizing a public health approach to identify the supports, policies, and structures in communities that help families be their strongest. All families should have access to the resources and supports that enhance the social determinants of health and underserved and under represented groups should have a voice in community planning efforts.
- Courageous Honesty: Listening deeply to other perspectives about our work and needed changes in our system.
- Active Engagement: Including the voices of those who will be most impacted by the change, especially caregivers and youth who have been involved in the systems we seek to change. This means sharing power, resources, and information, and using language that is easily understood and accessible.
- Investing Time: Investing time to come to a shared understanding of key terms and concepts.
- Data-Driven: Integrating evaluation of our efforts from the beginning so that we can clearly identify our successes and what needs modification.
- Flexibility: Knowing that the work must be dynamic, we are intentional, reflective, and willing to make changes when our analysis of the data or our partners’ perspectives on the data indicates we should.
- Trauma-Informed: Integrating our knowledge about the impact of trauma, we actively resist retraumatization, and support actions and programs that promote healing.
- Reduce Stigma: Acknowledging that a barrier to families seeking support sooner is the stigma associated with asking for We see reducing this stigma as a component of our work.
- Contribution to a growing body of work: Articulating our lessons learned not only to benefit the states participating in the Institute but to contribute to the growing body of work transforming child welfare systems into child wellbeing systems.
References for what shared values and principles offer to systems change collaboratives and organizations:
Hsieh, Tony. (May 24, 2010). How Zappos Infuses Culture Using Core Values. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2010/05/how-zappos-infuses-culture-using-core-values
Stanleigh, M. (June 16, 2011). How to Make Your Organization’s Values and Principles More Effective. Business Improvement Architects. https://bia.ca/how-to-make-your-organizations-values-and-principles-more-effective/
Stroh, David Peter. (2015). Systems Thinking for Social Change: A Practical Guide to Solving Complex Problems, Avoiding Unintended Consequences, and Achieving Lasting Results, Chelsea Green Publishing, (pps. 84 and 201).
Adverse Community Experiences and Resilience: A Framework for Understanding Community Trauma
The PMI 3-2-1 newsletter shares three ideas, two quotes, and one question to ponder. This issue focuses on community trauma, how it is different from individual trauma, its impacts, and possibilities for initiating healing in communities. Thank you to Dana Fields-Johnson, a Director with the Prevention Institute, for editing this Spring 2024 issue.
FRIENDS and our PMI partners rotate editing each edition. The format, 3-2-1, is based on James Clear’s newsletter that shares ideas related to developing effective habits, drawing from his book, Atomic Habits.
There is more known about the impact of trauma than ever. If unaddressed, at the individual level, trauma makes it hard to succeed in school, interferes with work productivity, damages relationships, increases the risk of suicide and other forms of violence, and is associated with shorter lifespans. When it manifests as a community phenomenon, trauma damages community cohesion, fosters damaging norms, and exacerbates individual trauma. For communities, this can mean compromised academic achievement; diminished economic productivity; and shorter, less healthy lives causing human suffering and increased healthcare and other systems costs. Fortunately, there is more than ever known about how to address and prevent trauma at both the individual and community levels, making communities stronger and more resilient to cope with, and address, the next potential adverse community experience. (Source: Prevention Institute’s Adverse Community Experience and Resilience Framework)
Idea #1
Trauma extends beyon individuals to impact communities and manifests as symptoms in the community Environment. There is a growing understanding about the prevalence and impact of trauma. Prevention Institute’s Adverse Community Experiences and Resilience (ACE|R): A Framework for Addressing and Preventing Community Trauma was the first framework of its kind to advance an understanding of trauma at the community level and to work toward community resilience and prevention. The framework advances the understanding that adverse community experiences contribute to individual and community-level trauma. Community trauma is not just the aggregate of individuals who have experienced trauma in a neighborhood or community. It is the impact of chronic adversity in a community and manifests as symptoms in the socio-cultural, physical, and equitable opportunity environment. Community trauma symptoms include disconnected social relations and support networks, low sense of political and social efficacy, deteriorated built environments, lack of access to healthy foods, inadequate schools, limited employment opportunities, community disinvestment, and intergenerational poverty, to name a few. Trauma—individual and community—serve as a barrier to effective solutions to promote health, safety, and well-being and requires collective action across systems to put in place solutions to prevent and address community trauma.
Idea #2
Healing is a starting point for family and community agencies addressing trauma. It’s very challenging to get families and communities dealing with trauma to act without healing first. A community that experiences community trauma without healing does not necessarily have the full capacity and efficacy to organize effectively around solutions to address threats against being a healthy community. This means that while addressing the underlying reasons for community trauma it is critical to support thriving communities and a key element of this transformation necessarily includes addressing and preventing community trauma so that communities themselves have the agency to identify and achieve their own solutions. Supporting community healing and building community resilience fosters families and communities that can thrive and creates conditions for effective collective action by communities to find solutions that improve health, safety, and wellbeing.
Idea #3
There are strategies to address community-level trauma. Community trauma can be addressed through action at the community level to foster more resilient communities and at the systems and policy level to alter the factors that are contributing to community trauma. At the community level, preventing and addressing community trauma requires a comprehensive approach. It can be integrated into community planning efforts designed to address multiple issues such as safety, mental wellbeing, healthy eating/activity environments, and community and economic development. The planning process itself can help support healing and build resilience. At the systems level, systems, such as education, housing, justice, and child welfare, must recognize their tremendous impact – historical and present day – on the communities they serve to achieve better outcomes. Trauma-informed systems transformation will require authentic, healing-centered engagement and power-sharing with parents, caregivers, and families in the system. Examples of power-sharing strategies include participatory budgeting, shared leadership and decision-making, and co-design of policies, programs, and strategies to promote family and community resilience.
“A healing-centered approach views trauma not simply as an individual isolated experience, but rather highlights the ways in which trauma and healing are experienced collectively. The term healing-centered engagement expands how we think about responses to trauma and offers a more holistic approach to fostering well-being.”
~ Dr. Shawn Ginwright, Author, Professor, Activist
Source: “The Future of Healing: Shifting From Trauma Informed Care to Healing Centered Engagement”
“Our systems don’t recognize how trauma impacts people, and as a result decision makers in those systems create trauma and hold people in a space of trauma……. If we don’t talk about it and acknowledge it, then it’s very difficult to bring about change.”
~ Allison Wainwright, CEO of Family Life, Australia’s largest family services providers working with vulnerable children and families
Source: Laura Calderon de la Barca, Katherine Milligan, and John Kania. Healing Systems: How recognizing trauma in ourselves, other people, and the systems around us can open up new pathways to solving social problems. February 12, 2024, Stanford Social Innovation Review, Retrieved March 29, 2024. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/healing-trauma-systems”
In what ways is your agency/organization working to advance policies and strategies that support healing in children, families, and communities? As you consider systems transformation, where do you see the biggest opportunities to promote healing and resilience in children and families?
Three Key Ingredients
to Building Communities of Support and Well-Being
The PMI 3-2-1 newsletter shares three ideas, two quotes, and one question to ponder. This issue focuses on advancing our efforts to Build Communities of Well-Being and Support. We thank Alex Morales, Child Welfare League of America, Board Member; Retired CEO of Children’s Bureau of Southern California; founding spark to the Magnolia Community Initiative in Los Angeles, for editing this fall 2023 issue.
FRIENDS and our PMI partners rotate editing each edition. The format, 3-2-1, is based on James Clear’s newsletter that shares ideas related to developing effective habits, drawing from his book, Atomic Habits.
We are in a wonderful and much needed era of awareness after the 60+ year journey since the Battered Child Syndrome was identified by David Kempt, M.D. in the 1960’s. Kempt’s call shocked society into the recognition and commitment to intervene to protect children from child abuse within their own family. Today we are aware of the value of a child abuse surveillance system, and we are also aware of some significant limitations of that system. Now we are boldly moving forward to build communities of support and well-being versus communities of surveillance across our country that can be present BEFORE a child and family encounter our formal public child welfare system. Here are three important ideas that need to be front and center in our efforts.
Idea #1
Recognize, stimulate, and harness natural helping community systems as the cornerstone for building communities of support and well-being. Family, relatives, friends, neighbors, caring co-workers, faith community, parent and adult groups, teachers, recreational activities, family daycare providers, after school activities, school-parent groups, community activities, parent and neighborhood associations, and the high trust local community organizations where neighbors come for information, support and collective action are just some wonderful examples. Natural helping systems are where the powerful regenerative wellness forces of supportive relationships are unleashed. Public services are important, but they can never substitute for a lack of natural helping community activities, systems, and organizations. We must make sure that our building of public and community services and community pathways does not overlook the first essential task of stimulating and supporting the building block of natural helping community systems. Engage and fund trusted community organizations with neighborhood voices to lead the way in building and stimulating these vital natural helping systems.
Idea #2
Invest in concrete and economic supports as an essential and impactful strategy for the primary and secondary prevention of neglect. We now know that most child maltreatment reports are due to child neglect rather than abuse. Our efforts to build supportive communities must intentionally include targeted strategies to address child neglect. Research is pointing to the dynamic of poverty as a significant contributor to the problem of neglect as well as its exacerbation. Communities of support must incorporate the targeted strategy of concrete and financial support in their model design. This includes increasing availability of public benefits in their state; assessing family’s financial needs, helping families navigate access to public benefits and services they need and are entitled to, and providing flexible funds for families to address economic crisis events.
Idea #3
Reduce stigma & build trust in the community. To build communities of support, we must take on the transformational challenge of developing activities and services that families know about and are attracted to versus coerced into. The strength of the family’s attraction is directly proportional to the building of trust in the community with the organizations that offer support, as well as the degree that stigma is minimized. Families will be attracted to participate and work to improve their own community/neighborhood at the rate that people feel a sense of belonging in their community. Harnessing the community organizations that have high trust in the community is an effective way to increase family participation. And we must acknowledge that there is a high degree of stigma in our society related to people who are economically poor. Our society often judges economically poor people as lazy, undeserving of help, and causing their own plight (addiction, mental health, poverty, substance abuse, joblessness, homelessness, etc.) Furthermore, people who experience discrimination based on who they are adds a significant trust barrier and stigma. Strategies for building trust and reducing stigma need to be specifically addressed in the partnerships we bring together and in our planning designs for communities of support.
“I went there seeking help from those who worked there. But ultimately it was the women beside me who gave me the strength, emotional support, and resources to make it through that experience.”
~ Experience at a women’s shelter. Jennifer De Rosa; I’m a Single Mom: Changing the Stigma, April 10, 2022, fargomom.com
“Our policy framework in child welfare has never taken on the support of family economic needs, and there really is a new opportunity for a policy framework that is nuanced and that tackles the reasons why families are coming to our attention.”
~Weiner, D. A., Anderson, C., & Thomas, K. (2021). System transformation to support child and family well-being: The central role of economic and concrete supports. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago. Retrieved 11.20.23: https://www.chapinhall.org/research/economic-supports-child-welfare/
Imagine you are sent to an alternate universe where there are NO MANDATED CHILD NEGLECT REPORTING LAWS. You are asked how to create community solutions to prevent child neglect, and to strengthen family and community support and well-being. What would it look like?
Click here to download a printable version of this content.
Creating a Family Support Movement: Lessons from Mental Health
The PMI 3-2-1 newsletter shares three ideas, two quotes, and one question to ponder. This issue focuses on learning lessons from the mental health movement to create a stronger family support movement. How do we normalize help seeking for all families? Thank you to Theresa Costello, CEO of Action 4 Child Protection, for editing this Spring 2023 issue.
Future issues that focus on topics relevant to shifting to a prevention mindset will be shared periodically. FRIENDS and our PMI partners rotate editing each edition.
The format, 3-2-1, is based on James Clear’s newsletter that shares ideas related to developing effective habits, drawing from his book, Atomic Habits.
- We have a fundamental problem in prevention because our society at large has characterized “asking for help” as a negative. In the child welfare arena, we would like to see more families reach out to community resources and supports as they see needs in their families, but many don’t because they are afraid to show weakness or need and fear that coming forward might expose them to the threat of referral to the child protective services system.
- Help is not a form of weakness. We must somehow influence our systems and ourselves to see that asking for help is in fact an empowering act. Everyone goes through stages in life, we have a need for change, it is natural and good. And we often cannot make those changes alone, so it is a good and normal thing to seek help.
- The mental health movement offers us some hope. Thanks to many efforts at different levels and from different audiences (athletes, celebrities, entertainers) ending the stigma of talking about and seeking help for mental health is happening. There are efforts to build technology to make it easier to seek help. Mental health wellness is being framed as everyone’s business. There are many parallels to families in need of supports and resources to prevent child abuse and individuals in need of mental health resources. The stigma is similar, the need to raise awareness and emphasize the importance of seeking help is similar.Just as we have begun to prioritize prevention of mental health disorders by promoting healthy habits such as exercise, sleep, and healthy eating; reducing exposure to toxic stressors; and fostering supportive relationships, we can prioritize child abuse prevention by promoting home visiting programs, diversion programs for at-risk families; and parent support groups, to name just a few.
Just as we are seeing an expansion in access to mental health care and we are seeing increasing efforts to reduce barriers such as cost, transportation, and limited availability of services, we can invest in the expansion of resources and services to provide basic supports to families to meet basic needs; to increase access to health care and adequate housing as a couple of examples.
And finally, just as the mental health community is addressing systemic issues because mental health disorders are often linked to broader societal issues such as poverty, racism, and discrimination; this is equally true in family support/child abuse prevention. Addressing these issues through policy and advocacy can help to create a more equitable society and reduce the stresses on families, which helps to build strong families.
“Mental illness is nothing to be ashamed of, but stigma and bias shame us all.”
~Bill Clinton
“Let us put our minds together and see what life we can make for our children.”
~Sitting Bull
How do we create a family support movement that shifts the narrative from “shame” to everyone needs help now and then; from reporting families as neglecting to supporting families who are lacking basic needs; and from stigmatizing families to advocating for families?
Click here to download a printable version of this content.
The Prevention Mindset Institute Newsletter is intended to provide helpful information and resources and another method for keeping us connected in our systems change community. The newsletter shares three ideas, two quotes, and one question to ponder.
This edition focuses on ideas shared by the creator of the 3-2-1 newsletter, James Clear, as well as ideas from the first cohort of PMI states who started this journey with us during the winter, 2020. Clear authored Atomic Habits: Tiny Changes, Remarkable Results.
Idea #1
“Persistence and variety. These are the two primary ways to develop great ideas or to solve important problems.
Keep leaning your head against a topic for a long time. Certainly, for weeks, possibly for years. And along the way, try many lines of attack. Continue to generate options, explore paths, and propose silly ideas. Copy and paste concepts from widely different disciplines and see if it gets you anywhere. All the while, continue to refine the best solution you’ve found thus far.
What looks like genius may simply be the byproduct of persistence and variety.”
~James Clear, 3-2-1 Newsletter, 12.1.22 edition
An excellent message and strategy to apply in creating a new continuum of services for families that is centered on positive support and primary and secondary prevention and keeping families together whenever possible.
Idea #2
The California PMI state team has focused on winning “hearts and minds” within their state department before working with external partners; and on expanding the understanding of what upstream prevention is among as many stakeholders as possible. How are they doing this?
The California Department of Social Services, Strategies TA, and the California Training Institute is Reimagining Prevention through an initiative focused on comprehensive prevention planning and moving upstream toward primary prevention. Read more about the initiative and the series of webinars offered during 2022: https://www.caltrin.org/training-archive/reimagining-prevention-webinar-series-archive/
Learn more about winning hearts and minds of collaborators and changing culture: https://preventchildabuse.org/resources/prevention-creates-the-future-by-transforming-culture-dr-jeff-linkenbach/ Dr. Jeff Linkenbach has researched and taught on the Science of the Positive and changing social norms for more than a decade.
Idea #3
“Every transaction is paid for at least three times. First, with the money you pay. Second, with the time you spend. Third, with the reputation you create through your behavior. Being pleasant, reliable, and easy to work with might cost you a little more time. Perhaps even a bit of extra money. But the long-term returns from a great reputation usually outweigh the cost of a single transaction.
Most of the value in life and in business arises out of good relationships.~James Clear, 3-2-1 Newsletter, 10.27.22 edition
Texas began its focus on raising public awareness and changing social norms around help seeking with a values statement, “we all benefit from community support”. Each of us raising kids or caring for adults, need people to help us, and we need community and systems to help us. We all face obstacles; some families face greater obstacles than others.
See the Children’s Bureau’s Learning and Coordination Center (CBLCC) Digital Dialogue on Changing Social Norms Around Help Seeking, featuring the Prevention Mindset Institute and work in Texas and Kentucky. https://friendsnrc.org/resources/digital-dialogue-asking-for-help-is-a-sign-of-strength-changing-social-norms-about-help-seeking/
______________________
“Our helping organizations for families should be like an AT&T store.” Families should not enter and hear, what do you need? Why are you here? Instead, there needs to be a welcoming climate, “what can I do for you today? How can I help?”. If I am not made to feel comfortable and feel there is a welcoming atmosphere, I am not going to ask for help. We should be neighborhood friendly.
~Valerie Lebanion, FRIENDS’ Parent Advisory Council member
and Kentucky PMI State Team
Do I need to spend more time searching for better information or do I need to spend more time acting on the information I already have? Is the bottleneck strategy or execution?
~James Clear
Click here to download a printable version of this content.
The PMI 3-2-1 newsletter shares three ideas, two quotes, and one question to ponder. This issue focuses on mindset shifts, complex systems change, and being brave and creative. Future issues that focus on topics relevant to engagement in the Prevention Mindset Institute will be shared periodically. Parents and our other partners will rotate editing each edition.
The format, 3-2-1, is based on James Clear’s newsletter that shares ideas related to developing effective habits, drawing from his book, Atomic Habits.
1) What We Mean When We Say “Systems Change”
Given that a systemic approach requires intentional work at multiple levels—from the micro tothe macro—we also intend to bridge these concepts from the social sector to everyday life. Thework we’re talking about here is more than just collaboration and strategy setting withinorganizations or networks. It’s about our individual mindsets and values and how we act onthem. In every interaction. Everyday.An excerpt from an essay by Motaz Attalla, Jennifer Berman, Jessica Conrad, Ruth Rominger, and Eleni Sotos from the Garfield Foundation.~Read more: https://bioneers.org/what-we-mean-when-we-say-systems-change-zp0z2107/
2) One roadblock almost never ruins you
There might not be 1000 ways to accomplish something, but there is almost always more than one way.Know what you want. Be flexible about how to get there.
~James Clear, Atomic Habits: An Easy & Proven Way to Build Good Habits & Break Bad Ones,
October 16, 2018 https://jamesclear.com/atomic-habits3)
~Read more about each of these dimensions:
https://atctools.org/toolkit_tool/wheel-of-change-planning-template/
“When I dare to be powerful – to use my strength in the service of my vision, then it becomes less and less important whether I am afraid.”
~Audre Lorde, American writer, feminist, womanist, librarian, and civil rights activist
“Why are we so often more focused on solving problems and less focused on creating possibilities?”
~Heard in webinar on May 12, 2022, with Mining for Gold’s, Corey Best.
How can I make a difference in this complex system?
https://hbr.org/2021/04/6-strategies-for-leading-through-uncertainty
This article may offer some assistance in answering this question. Six Strategies for Leading Through Uncertainty, Harvard Business Review, April 2021. Rebecca Zucker and Darin Rowell offer six strategies that accelerate your ability to learn, evolve, and navigate progressively complex challenges.
- Embrace the Discomfort of Not Knowing
- Distinguish Between Complicated and Complex
- Let Go of Perfectionism
- Resist Oversimplifications and Quick Conclusions
- Don’t Go It Alone
- Zoom Out
Click here to download a printable version of this content.
This 3-2-1 newsletter shares three ideas, two quotes, and one question to ponder. In this edition, we focus on what a reimagined prevention services system will require and on families as important leaders of this new vision and transformation. A special thank you to Teresa Rafael, Executive Director of the Children’s Trust Fund Alliance, for developing this edition of the newsletter.
Future issues are planned for May and July 2021.
The format, 3-2-1, is based on James Clear’s newsletter that shares ideas related to developing effective habits, drawing from his book, Atomic Habits.
1) Creating a reimagined Prevention Services System in the United States will require a whole new approach not only to the services we deliver but also to the ways in which we deliver them…
A robust, comprehensive prevention system would not just prevent tragedies before they occur, but it would also offer upfront, cost-effective strategies that could strengthen all families and reduce the need to remove children from their families in the first place. …
We envision this new system being led by a dedicated agency or department that is adequately funded to ensure the coordination of prevention resources so that all families, regardless of where they reside, can access services to keep their children safe, healthy, and well. This prevention system would provide equal attention to the prevention of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and the promotion of positive childhood experiences.
This focus on prevention will need to be supported with a robust policy agenda, including policies that address the economic strain that affects all too many families… This prevention system must be constructed with the recognition that there are systemic injustices in our society that limit opportunity and access for some children and families.
Many families do not trust the systems that have been put in place to “help,” because they often experience discrimination when they attempt to access those services. A new, comprehensive prevention system would fundamentally work to alter the conditions and contexts in which children and families live in order to produce equitable outcomes for all.
~The Chronicle of Social Change, It’s Time for State Prevention Services Systems, July 21, 2020
Jennifer Jones and Bart Klika (Prevent Child Abuse America)2) We hope that in the future, it will be common practice for leaders, service providers, child welfare workers, and other stakeholders to respond to families’ requests and needs in a way that builds trust and strengthens the capacity of parents. As parents, we want to feel comfortable calling a service provider and being able to ask questions when needed. For example, one of us might have a question relating to our child’s limited use of words and wonder whether this is typical of the child’s developmental stage or something we should worry about? We are asking for help in fulfilling our role as providers and caretakers for our children. We are not asking for you to fix our problems but to help us identify what is best for our family. We want YOU to help US help our children in the best way possible…
Our hope is that families are, ultimately, connected to appropriate resources through the prevention system and that we are able to prevent families from becoming involved with the child welfare system. Please be the person who gives us real hope, not because you have all the answers but because you help us believe in ourselves. We challenge you to join with those who already focus their work on building relationships with families, being dependable, and identifying strengths. As a service provider, always ask yourself, how have I worked in partnership with this family and supported them to reach their full potential? As a leader, ask yourself how have I partnered with family members to be sure our policies and practices reflect what will be most successful in my community or state. We, as parents need to be supported and guided in our journeys to address challenges that led us to reach out for support. Later, we want opportunities to use our life experiences to give back to the communities and agencies that helped us grow and change.
We are working to expand the recognition that supportive communities can help build strong families willing and able to ask for help. We must join together to change public perceptions regarding families. We are recommending that systems create opportunities for parents to work in partnership with community service providers, systems leaders (including child welfare leaders), and other key stakeholders to promote a culture shift where asking for help is normalized and seen as a strength. We have seen how powerful it is when parents and service providers work with community, state, and national leaders to build a public perspective that values families and the importance of supporting their growth, including extended family, friends, and other supportive individuals. When we all work together, we can change public attitudes and build support for this approach.
~Children’s Trust Fund Alliance, Birth Parent National Network, 2020,
What Parents Say About… Building a 21st Century
Community-Based Approach to Strengthening Families
https://ctfalliance.sharefile.com/share/view/s8d47a5c1da04de683) The key to moving forward in transforming the current child welfare system into a new way of work that keeps children safely with their families is requiring systems to work together and in partnership with families and communities. Transformation is a goal too massive for any one person, organization, or system to do alone. True change will come when we work together to create community conditions where all people, especially children, and their families, can thrive. We don’t need to know exactly what to do to begin, and it’s not up to professionals or systems to figure this out by ourselves. We just need to take the lead from families—who know better than anyone else what their needs are—and start “doing.” Helping families to safely raise their own children is the key. Hero-based rescuing and removing and out-of-family placement must end. We simply know better; now let’s do better.
~Building a New Way, Together, Dr. Amelia Franck Meyer, Chief Executive Officer, Alia,
CBX, August/September 2020, Vol. 21, No. 6
“When parents seek resources, let us remove punitive system barriers and change the way we see and talk about helping families and ensure that our efforts build hope. If a child asked for support, we would comply without any hesitation. Let us be as motivated to support parents as we are children and acknowledge the importance of keeping families together.”
~Shrounda Selivanoff, birth parent (Washington)
“As parents the hardest thing in the world to face is not being able to meet the needs of our children and having to ask for help. We go back and forth in our thinking – should I pick up the phone and ask for help? Will you judge me for asking? Are you going to call child protective services? All we want to do is provide for our children.”
~Kimberly Mays, Parent and Social Services Worker, Washington State Office of Public Defense
Children’s Trust Fund Alliance, 2020, What Parents Say About… Building a 21st Century Community-Based Approach to Strengthening Families
https://ctfalliance.sharefile.com/share/view/s8d47a5c1da04de680
(Kimberly Mays, Parent who lost custody of nine of her ten children and they have now all reunited with her as adults. Kimberly now has an MSW and was instrumental in starting the first Parent for Parent Program in WA State. She is a social services worker with the Washington State Office of Public Defense and a caregiver for relative and non-relative foster youth.)
What would it look like if parents in communities across the country could seek and find help without fear of shame, blame or loss of their children?
Click here to download a printable version of this content.
This 3-2-1 newsletter shares three ideas, two quotes, and one question to ponder. In this edition, we focus on developing a prevention mindset and the impact of trauma and avoiding re-traumatization of families and communities. A special thank you to Theresa Costello, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Action for Child Protection for developing this edition of the newsletter.
Future issues are planned for March, May, and June, 2021.
The format, 3-2-1, is based on James Clear’s newsletter that shares ideas related to developing effective habits, drawing from his book, Atomic Habits.
1) “While child welfare has always had a focus on the physical safety of the child, a trauma-informed child welfare system must go further and recognize that psychological safety of both the child and his/her family is extraordinarily important to the child’s and family’s long-term recovery and social and emotional well-being. Psychological safety is a sense of safety, or the ability to feel safe, within oneself self and safe from external harm. This type of safety has direct implications for physical safety and permanence and is critical for functioning as well as physical and emotional growth. A lack of psychological safety can impact a child’s and family’s interactions with all other individuals, including those trying to help them, and can lead to a variety of maladaptive strategies for coping with the anxiety associated with feeling unsafe.”
~Essential Elements of a Trauma-Informed Child Welfare System. (2014). From https://calswec.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/4-6_chadwickessentialelements.pdf
2) “In recognizing the impact of childhood adversity on child and adult outcomes, trauma-informed services strive to build trustworthy collaborative relationships with children and the important adults in their lives, as well as improve consistency and communication across linked organizations and sectors, with the aim of mitigating the impact of adversity by supporting and enhancing child and family capacity for resilience and recovery.”
~Bunting, Montgomery, Mooney, MacDonald, Coulter, Hayes, & Davidson. (2019).
Trauma Informed Child Welfare Systems—A Rapid Evidence Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13), 2365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph161323653) Trauma-informed care redirects attention from treating symptoms of trauma (e.g., mental health disorders, behavioral problems) to treating the underlying causes and context of trauma. Trauma-specific interventions include medical, physiological, psychological, and psychosocial therapies provided by a trained professional that aid in the recovery from adverse trauma exposures. Treatments are designed to maximize a child’s sense of physical and psychological safety, develop coping strategies, and increase a child’s resilience. These treatments allow children to attain a sense of balance, make strides in meeting developmental benchmarks, heal deep emotional scars, and achieve stability in their foster placements [or at home with parent(s)].
~Klain, E., & White, A. (2013). Implementing Trauma-Informed Practices in Child Welfare. From http://www.centerforchildwelfare.org/kb/TraumaInformedCare/ImplementingTraumaInformedPracticesNov13.pdf
“Trauma Informed Systems’ principles and practices support reflection in place of reaction, curiosity in lieu of numbing, self-care instead of self-sacrifice and collective impact rather than silo-ed structures.”
~Epstein, K | Speziale, K | Gerber, E | Loomis, B (2014). From Trauma Transformed’s website: https://traumatransformed.org/communities-of-practice/communities-of-practice-tis.asp
“A trauma-informed child and family service system is one in which all parties involved recognize and respond to the impact of traumatic stress on those who have contact with the system including children, caregivers, and service providers. Programs and agencies within such a system infuse and sustain trauma awareness, knowledge, and skills into their organizational cultures, practices, and policies. They act in collaboration with all those who are involved with the child, using the best available science, to maximize physical and psychological safety, facilitate the recovery of the child and family, and support their ability to thrive.”
~Peterson, S. (2018, September 20). Creating Trauma-Informed Systems. From The National Child Traumatic Stress Network website: https://www.nctsn.org/trauma-informed-care/creating-trauma-informed-systems
How do we move from being “trauma-reactive” to minimally “trauma-informed” and ideally to a “healing organization/system”?
~Trauma Transformed website. October 2020 from:
http://traumatransformed.org/communities-of-practice/trauma-informed-systems-tis/
Click here to download a printable version of this content.
This 3-2-1 newsletter shares three ideas, two quotes, and one question to ponder. In this edition, we focus on systems change and shifting mindsets. We will send new issues in December, March, April, and June, prior to the in-person Institute.
The format, 3-2-1, is based on James Clear’s newsletter that shares ideas related to developing effective habits, drawing from his book, Atomic Habits.
1) “In highly successful change efforts, people find ways to help others see the problems or solutions in ways that influence emotions, not just thought. In other words, when change works, it’s because leaders are speaking to the Elephant as well as to the Rider.” Change only works if the Elephant and Rider are working together.
Dan and Chip Heath, authors of Switch: How to Change Things When Change is Hard, explain that we have two parts to us. We have the emotional side (the Elephant) and the rational side (the Rider). Most of us think that the Rider always controls the Elephant, but in most cases, it’s the other way around. The Elephant somehow ends up controlling the Rider. If the Rider can direct the Elephant down a well-prepared path then there is a good chance for change.
~Heath, Chip and Dan Heath. Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard.
Toronto: Random House Canada, 2010.
2) Shifts in system conditions are more likely to be sustained when working at three different levels of change: explicit, semi-explicit, and implicit. FSG sees these levels as 1. structural change (explicit-policies, practices, the flow of resources), 2. relational change (semi-explicit- relationships and connections, power dynamics), and 3. transformative change (implicit-mental models). FSG correlates transformative change with mental models or deeply held beliefs and assumptions that influence one’s actions. These three levels of change can be independently defined, measured, and targeted for change, and they are intertwined and interact with each other.
“Since the less explicit conditions are the most challenging to clarify but can have huge impacts on shifting systems, changemakers must ensure that they pay sufficient attention to the relationships, power dynamics, and especially the underlying mental models embedded in the systems in which they work.”
~John Kania, Mark Kramer, Peter Senge. The Water of Systems Change. FSG: Reimagining Social
Change, May 2018. https://www.fsg.org/publications/water_of_systems_change
3) In a conversation with two parent leaders, Valerie Lebanion and Joanne Hodgeman, who are both also full-time social workers and family advocates, several important ideas were shared. A few are offered here:
Child protection service providers and primary preventionists, need to continually ask themselves, “What is it that keeps families from asking for help sooner?
”Often family support services are available but it can be difficult for even trained professionals to easily identify and thereby access the services. Ultimately, we need a full-time person in every state whose job it is to maintain an accurate, up-to-date registry of appropriate services that are available throughout the state. At a minimum, “If the state is funding you, the state should be promoting you.” Lebanion and Hodgeman have discovered that even state-funded services are sometimes not marketed in such a way as to be easily identifiable. How does your state or county share information on support services with agencies and families?
~Read more about Joanne Hodgeman and Valerie Lebanion:
https://friendsnrc.org/parent-leadership/parent-advisory-council/
“We must recognize that all of these systems are operating within, and often constrained by, an overall system that itself is built on a history of racism and lack of priority for children, poor people, and more recently, immigrants.” James-Brown said, in a letter to the Child Welfare League of American membership.
“I say go back to our founding – was the system founded by white men and funded by white men for racist reasons? Yes. The funding and policies of the CPS system in particular were developed by White men and reflect their values and views about families. But it is what it is. So now how do we go and root out the things that allowed the system to operate that way?
Our front door is very problematic, the way children get into the child welfare system and why. Who are the reporters to our hotlines? What does the hotline do with the information? How good is the training for reporters? How good are the alternatives and to what extent do we use them? Our group has had a lot of discussion about moving the system to understanding its role as strengthening families instead of being looked at as the ones who want to remove children.
We need to focus like a laser on keeping kids with their families and acting as advocates for them getting the dollars they need to do what they want to do. The guidelines and practices around the whole CPS area are important.”
~Christine James-Brown, CEO Child Welfare League of America interviewed in an article, Child Welfare League of America CEO: Field Must Confront Its Racist Roots, written by Michael Fitzgerald and posted on 8/2/202 in The Imprint: Youth and Family News. https://imprintnews.org/child-welfare-2/child-welfare-league-of-america-ceo-field-must-confront-its-racist-roots/45794
“One of the great errors that organizations make is shutting down what is a natural, life-enhancing process—chaos. We are terrified of chaos. As a manager, it signals failure. But if you move out of control and into an appreciation of natural order, you understand that the only way a system changes is when it is far from equilibrium, when it moves from the ‘quiet’ we treasure and is confronted with the choice to die or reorganize. And you can’t reorganize to a higher level unless you risk the perils of the path through chaos.”
~Margaret Wheatley – https://margaretwheatley.com/bio/
“Assume that more than one path exists to achieve your ideal life.”
~James Clear’s 3-2-1 Newsletter released on 7/16/2020
This would suggest that more than one path exists to change your child welfare system.
What would an alternative path look like?
Click here to download a printable version of this content.
National Experts partnering in the work include:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3842c/3842cf773d957088151b56f8b468a1830d7b3ac1" alt=""
- 2022-2023 Cohort
- 2020-2021 Cohort
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/740e9/740e927f7c856718012a6ac49df8d4774c5e0b82" alt=""
Indiana
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f94b/8f94b2e7409a8a7dd58d86b117872fd8f1677f68" alt=""
Kentucky
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/228cf/228cf87d89dbe4f9abd361e621d4e304674305f0" alt=""
Maine
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf3d4/bf3d4ee40fc417f895bf270cac5161fc55b3455d" alt=""
Michigan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c20/62c2006abb5f9c182869cbc9b4eb648788c4a089" alt=""
Oregon
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02d36/02d3678d0971f29764db1d584054f7dc37482e9b" alt=""
Washington
The current cohort will meet in-person in Baltimore in August of 2022 with various speakers, partners, staff and mentors to further their work together. More information about their outcomes and progress will be shared in the fall of 2022.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfc5e/bfc5e7b216273f0d8aeed9c26d23fd092475e2a8" alt=""
Alabama
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/995ca/995cae3556a4f5648c4db9e427f2d07eb18bfd84" alt=""
California
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae025/ae02591d259cb34b716d82597951e4df8c8a6911" alt=""
Ohio
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81f92/81f925424541946457f657e9b0a9bfbe254191fb" alt=""
Texas
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51dfa/51dfa782e30dd6941331ac73f565a8a3ed026835" alt=""
Wyoming