Protective factors

What are protective factors?

They are characteristics or conditions that reduce or buffer the effects of risk, stress, or trauma. A protective factor is an asset of some kind.

For example:

  • A skill, personal attribute, or supportive relationship
  • A community that offers supportive services

Why protective factors?

  • Research has shown that the promotion of protective factors is a key intervention strategy that can improve social and emotional well-being in children and youth.
  • Children who have experienced or are at risk for maltreatment, trauma, and/or exposure to violence can be a highly vulnerable population, however
  • Outcomes for children can substantially improve by helping children and their families build protective factors.

For many years and in many cases, even now, the child abuse prevention field focused primarily on risk—how likely abuse or neglect might occur when risk factors are present. Risks, such as poverty, trauma, and disabilities, among others, are known to contribute to the likelihood that a child might be abused or neglected.

Yet most families—even those in risk—do not abuse or neglect their children. Certain conditions, when present in families’ lives, help them to overcome the odds that could otherwise lead to tragedy. Those conditions are protective factors.

Outcomes for children affected by trauma can be improved by helping them and their families build protective factors. In other words, protective factors help to mitigate risks; they can help families to weather life’s stress and trauma with less damage. Through building protective factors we can help families develop assets and skills for handling life’s challenges more effectively.

To learn more about what the research tells us about protective factors, see Research and Specific Protective Factors below.

Specific Protective Factors

Research in the field is growing and we now understand there are many protective factors. FRIENDS, through its work with the Children’s Bureau, has concentrated primarily on six protective factors that are frequently a focus of prevention services in the CBCAP community. These are highlighted in the annual Prevention Resource Guide.

Scroll through each protective factor below to see a detailed description of the factor and how parents and programs can implement activities that help to build that protective factor.


Other Frameworks

Early work in protective factors focused on early childhood, but over time, work has expanded to understand the impact of protective factors over the lifespan and how they can be built in individuals, families, and communities. The research and efforts across the spectrum continue to expand and develop.

There are many organizations engaged in this work, but the ones that most closely relate to our work in child abuse prevention are Administration for Children, Youth, and Families; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Center for the Study of Social Policy/ Strengthening Families. Let’s explore some of that work.

In 2012, ACYF undertook an effort to review the research in protective factors for relevant populations in order to provide a foundation for the development of a protective factors framework that could inform the work they were seeking to fund.

This work identified protective factors across three levels of the social ecology. These were the individual, the relationship level, and the community level. They identified the top 10 protective factors with the strongest evidence for ACYF populations. These factors were:

Individual Level

  • Self-regulation skills
  • Relational skills
  • Problem-solving skills
  • Involvement in positive activities

Relationship Level

  • Parenting competencies
  • Positive peers
  • Caring adults

Community Level

  • Positive community environment
  • Positive school environment
  • Economic opportunities

They are characteristics or conditions that reduce or buffer the effects of risk, stress, or trauma. A protective factor is an asset of some kind.

For example:

  • A skill, personal attribute, or supportive relationship
  • A community that offers supportive services

To learn more about this work and to read the full report and supporting information, visit https://dsgonline.com/protective-factors-framework-fro-acyf/

The Essentials for Childhood model builds on earlier work at the CDC in Safe, Stable, and Nurturing Relationships (SSNRs). SSNRs were established to provide critical components in preventing child maltreatment and the Essentials work looks to build on that importance. It proposes strategies for communities to use to promote SSNRs that will help children grow up to be healthy and productive.

The goals for the Essentials for Childhood work include:

Families have access to tangible goods and services to help families cope with stress, particularly in times of crisis or intensified need.

Program Strategies that work here:

  • Raising awareness and commitments to promote safe, stable and nurturing relationships and environments and prevent child maltreatment
  • Using data to inform actions
  • Creating a context for healthy children and families through norms change and programs
  • Creating a context for healthy children and families through policies

To learn more about this work and to fully explore SSNRs and the Essentials for Childhood Initiative, please visit https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/childabuseandneglect/essentials/index.html .

 

The Strengthening Families framework was developed several years ago for children aged 0-5 receiving services from child care facilities. That work identified five protective factors:

  • Parental resilience
  • Social connections
  • Knowledge of parenting and child development
  • Concrete support in times of need
  • Social-emotional competence of children

To learn more about the Strengthening Families framework, visit http://www.cssp.org/reform/strengthening-families.

Research

Focusing on families’ strengths and promoting protective factors is essential for minimizing the likelihood of children being exposed to maltreatment or neglect.

Research on characteristics of family functioning have highlighted the ways in which family structure, organization, cohesion, conflict management, and communication can lead to improved parenting quality (Gaudin et al., 1996). Further research shows that parent education programs are effective at improving family functioning, thus reducing the risk of child maltreatment (Geeraert, Noortgate, Grietens, & Onghena, 2004).

The influence of families’ extended social network and access to social and emotional support has also been shown to have a protective influence against parenting stress, which in turn buffers against child maltreatment. In particular, social networks, including family and non-family support, benefit families by providing parents with information on appropriate childrearing methods (Bronfenbrenner & Crouter, 1983; Moncher, 1995), moderating maladaptive parenting and stresses (Voight, Hans, & Bernstein, 1996), and supporting positive environments for infants and children.

Concrete supports that protect against the likelihood of child maltreatment are distinct in that parents experiencing financial difficulties suffer from elevated levels of depression, and in turn, lower psychological functioning (Jackson, Brooks-Gunn, Chien-Chung, & Glassman, 2000). Both of these factors contribute to parenting stress, which increases the likelihood of inconsistent and punitive discipline (McLoyd, 1998). These elements contribute to less than ideal home environments and elevated parenting stress, which both increase the likelihood of inconsistent, coercive, and punitive discipline (Cole & Cole, 1993; McLoyd, 1998). Having concrete support can help moderate financial stress, and ultimately lower the risk of child abuse (Cochran & Niego, 1995), demonstrating that access to concrete supports serves as a protection against the perpetration of child maltreatment.

Healthy parent-child relationships are reflected in nurturing and attachment factors that develop and strengthen the bonds between the child and caregivers. Research shows that maltreated children have lower quality attachment than non-maltreated children, and exhibit higher rates of aggression, and lower social competency and empathy (Crittenden, 1988; George & Main, 1979; Morton & Browne, 1998; Shonkoff & Phillips, 2004). In an effort to promote the protective aspect of healthy nurturing and attachment, prevention programs focusing on home visitation include strategies to help strengthen early parent-child relationships, which are effective in promoting parent-child bonding (Olds et al., 2002).

Having knowledge of appropriate parenting skills and an awareness of child development are similarly protective against a risk of abuse. Parents who participate in parenting education programs are linked with positive outcomes such as improved emotional well-being, more realistic expectations for children, and increased skills to communicate and interact with children, as well as changed parental beliefs about corporal punishment being an effective discipline technique (Geeraert et al., 2004; Lundahl, Nimer, & Parsons, 2006; MacLeod & Nelson, 2000; Repucci, Britner, & Woolard, 1997). Programs that focus on stress management and increasing parent knowledge of child development may help develop healthier, more appropriate parenting skills that would minimize the risk of abuse (Kaminski, Valle, Filene, & Boyle, 2008).

Efforts to prevent child maltreatment and neglect benefit from an applied protective factors framework, which allows programs to focus specifically on those factors that can be changed. For example, programs can reasonably expect changes in parental behaviors and attitudes as a result of parent education or home visitation. Risk factors such as low maternal age or significant reductions in neighborhood crime rates, on the other hand, are not as easily addressed by programs, nor are they as easily changed by program interventions (Ross & Vandivere, 2009). By looking at protective factors, we are able to extend the focus of prevention, since early care and education programs may not be familiar with addressing risks (Langford & Harper-Browne, in press).

While there are several instruments available that address individual protective factors, no single instrument had been developed to address multiple protective factors against child maltreatment that can be addressed by prevention programs. The Protective Factors Survey (PFS) was developed to address this need.

Bronfenbrenner, U.C., & Crouter, A.C. (1983). The evolution of environmental models in developmental research. In W. Kessen (Ed.), Handbook of child development: Vol.1.History, theories, and methods (pp. 358–414). New York: Wiley.

Cochran, M., & Niego, S. (1995). Parenting and social networks. In M. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (pp. 393–418). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cole, M., & Cole, S.R. (1993). The development of children. New York: Scientific American Books.

Counts, J.M., Buffington, E.S., Chang-Rios, K., Rasmussen, H.N., & Preacher, K.J. (2010). The development and validation of the protective factors survey: A self-report measure of protective factors against child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 762-772.

Crittenden, P.M. (1988). Relationships at risk. In J. Belsky, & T. Nezworski (Eds.), Clinical implications of attachment (pp. 136–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gaudin, J.M., Polansky, N.A., Kilpatrick, A.C., & Shilton, P. (1996). Family functioning in neglectful families. Child Abuse & Neglect, 20, 363–377.

Geeraert, L., Noortgate, W., Grietens, H., & Onghena, P. (2004). The effects of early prevention programs for families with young children at risk for physical child abuse and neglect: A meta-analysis. Child Maltreatment, 9, 277–291.

George, C., & Main, M. (1979). Social interactions of young abused children: Approach, avoidance, and aggression. Child Development, 50, 306–318.

Jackson, A., Brooks-Gunn, J., Chien-Chung, H., & Glassman, M. (2000). Single mothers in low-wage jobs: Financial strain, parenting, and preschoolers’ outcomes. Child Development, 71(5), 1409–1423.

Kaminski, J.W., Valle, L.A., Filene, J.H., & Boyle, C.L. (2008). A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(4), 567–589.

Langford, J., & Harper-Browne, C. (in press). Strengthening families through early care and education: Engaging families in familiar places to prevent child maltreatment.

Lundahl, B., Nimer, J., & Parsons, B. (2006). Preventing child abuse: A meta-analysis of parenting training programs. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 251–262.

MacLeod, J., & Nelson, G. (2000). Programs for the promotion of family wellness and the prevention of child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1127–1149.

McLoyd, V.C. (1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist, 53, 185–204.

Moncher, F.J. (1995). Social isolation and child-abuse risk. Families in Society, 76(7), 421–434.

Morton, N., & Browne, K. (1998). Theory and observation of attachment and its relation to child maltreatment: A review. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 1093–1104.

Olds, D.L., Robinson, J., O’Brien, R., Luckey, D.W., Pettitt, L.M., Henderson, C.R., Jr., Ng, R.K., Sheff, K.L., Korfmacher, J., Hiatt, S., & Talmi, A. (2002). Home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses: A randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics, 110, 486–496.

Repucci, N., Britner, P., & Woolard, J. (Eds.). (1997). Preventing child abuse and neglect through parent education. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing.

Ross, T., & Vandivere, S. (2009). Indicators for child maltreatment prevention programs. Child Trends. Shonkoff, J.P., & Phillips, D.A. (Eds.). (2004). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Voight, J.D., Hans, S.L., & Bernstein, V.J. (1996). Support networks of adolescent mothers: Effects on parenting experience and behavior. Infant Mental Health Journal, 17, 58–73.

We and selected third parties use cookies or similar technologies for technical purposes and, with your consent, for other purposes. You can consent to the use of such technologies by using the “Accept” button, by closing this notice, by scrolling this page, by interacting with any link or button outside of this notice or by continuing to browse otherwise.